Tuesday, April 8, 2008

Eli Lilly given immunity againt litigation for vaccines?

Say it isn't so, the scum bags running Washington decided to make it impossible to sue the big drug companies who make vaccines by slipping a provision into the "Homeland Security Act" a few years ago at the hight of the Autism-Vaccine controversy. I'm not for scum bag lawyers and pointless litigation but who in their right mind would want to give a company immunity that for decades pushed a product on the children of this country THEY KNEW was toxic and could cause brain damage! The sections of the Homeland Security Act in question are the last 4 provisions: Sections 1714, 1715, 1716, and 1717. Eli Lilly was aware of the concerns resulting from Thimerosal exposure since the early 1940’s and was advised by its own Medical Science Department in 1967 that the claim “Non-toxic” be removed from its Thimerosal labels. Lilly’s own materials safety data sheet acknowledges that exposure in children may cause mild to severe mental retardation and that mercury poisoning may occur.

Why anyone would vaccinate their kids is beyond me. Most religious jews don't get vaccinated and we're fine. Same for the Amish. I don't believe you'll find 1 case of Autism among either our people's unless they were vaccinated. What a country, eh?

No comments: